Most of the goods we buy for ourselves are not so easy to resell. They immediately lose some of their value. All things serve for a certain period of time, nothing lasts forever. Moreover, manufacturers have long been trying to make things of less and less quality, designed for a shorter lifespan. Leasing programs have long existed, which allow you to simply exchange your car for a new one after a certain period of time. Now this practice will be used everywhere.
Let's say a laptop costs $1,000. You'll be offered a contract where you'll pay $31 a month for it, and after three years, you'll automatically get a new one. Pros: you'll spread the payment over three years instead of paying all at once, and you'll automatically get a new computer. You'll probably also get a discount for staying with the company after three years.
Cons. You won't be able to sell the computer at its brazil mobile phone numbers database residual value, you won't be able to extend the use of the old device for more than 3 years. You were forced to buy it in 3 years, you can't live without the computer, right? The total amount of payments will be more than the initial 1000 USD.
What's better? I don't know, it's individual. But for most people, paying $31 a month is clearly better than $1,000 at once.
Another example. Shirts. Let's say a shirt wears out in 2 years. Let's say the average man buys 5 shirts a year at $50. The company will offer you a 3-year contract that will give you 5 shirts each year for $180. Cheaper?
Substantial. In exchange for a guaranteed payment. Plus, they'll take your old shirts so you don't get the stupid idea that you don't need so many because the old ones are still ok to wear.
Young girls want to change dresses, blouses, shoes as often as possible. What does this mean? They don't need to own most things, they need to rent them for going to the cinema or a club. Then return them and take a new one.
What does this mean for you as a consumer?
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:50 am