So what advantage does it have to pay for professional contingencies?

[ayeshshiddika11]

Oliver reassures her and explains that benefits for common contingencies also cover accidents at work. These benefits apply to all accidents, regardless of whether they occur in the workplace or not.

Oliver then goes on with an example: Let's say you have an accident and suffer an injury. Since you pay social security contributions for common contingencies, you are entitled to social security medical assistance. And what's more, if the injury prevents you from working, you can take sick leave. For the time you are on sick leave, as long as it is justified, you will receive financial assistance that can last for two years. After hearing this, Angela asks:


Oliver replies that to explain the difference he will use the same example but assuming that Angela was paying for occupational contingencies. In the case of accidents at work, Angela would have the right to costa rica phone data go to the mutual doctor. Medical care would be paid for by the mutual and would include rehabilitation and prescriptions for medicines. In the event of having to take sick leave, Angela would receive a subsidy for a maximum of two years. In this case, the financial aid would be maximum from the beginning. This would not be the case with the common contingency coverage, which provides 15% less money for the first 20 days.

Angela weighs the benefits of occupational contingency coverage. Perhaps it would be worth it for her to take advantage of these benefits, but it all depends on the following question:

How much more should you contribute to cover occupational contingencies?