- Ad what did you tell them?

[rakhirhif8963]

- Chief, this is certainly very convenient, but we will have to make a lot of efforts to ensure that no one, including our employees, can distribute these materials? Do you understand that this places a huge responsibility on us?

— Yes. We have already been approached by the privacy watchdog. They have long been concerned that the use of private surveillance cameras by police is detrimental to people's privacy and an excessive abuse of power by local law enforcement.


— That your front door video shows you coming and going from your home, your neighbors taking out the trash, and dog walkers and delivery guys doing their jobs on your street. Now we can have that footage streamed live to a dozen monitors that are monitored 24/7 by police. Even if you refuse to allow the footage to be used, your neighbor’s camera paraguay mobile database at your house can still transmit video directly to the police. What’s more, we save taxpayers money because using residents’ personal cameras is a way to build a surveillance network in neighborhoods without having to spend money or build trust in the community in terms of transparency. Plus, it allows police departments to avoid the expense of purchasing surveillance equipment and shift that burden to consumers by convincing them that they need cameras to protect their property. It also avoids the natural reaction of fear and distrust that many people would have if they learned that the police had installed dozens of cameras in their neighborhood, one on each house.

- I understand, but it is my duty to simply warn you of possible troubles.

— It’s not that simple. In the event of an incident, police can request video recorded by homeowners’ cameras for a specific geographic area and time range, but homeowners can deny the requests.

Two months have passed.

- Bob, there was a robbery at the grocery store on 13th . The problem is that the camera in the store is not working. Can you help?