It is a typical reaction of a company with a dominant position that is under pressure and therefore wants to impose itself more. It fits in perfectly with Microsoft, Google and Apple, all of whom compete for the favor of the user, the consumer. The user benefits from freedom of choice and apps are easy to install and remove. On the other hand, users sometimes appear to be less attached to their old services than expected. Internet Explorer and MSN turned out to be acceptable alternatives to Netscape and ICQ respectively.
with this strategy and alienate users. Microsoft learned this with Windows. Google is increasingly under fire for forcing manufacturers who want to use Android on their phones to also prominently install other Google products such as YouTube and Google Maps. Google has now proposed adjustments to meet the criticism of competitors and users.
Learning from the competition
Instead of pushing itself further, Facebook should come up with new guatemala mobile phone number list innovative services and listen to what users want. What can it learn from the success of its competitors?
First of all, 'apps' should be very easy to use. Checking and sharing status updates can be done faster with Twitter, chatting can be done better with Whatsapp ( rumor has it that Google recently had its eye on it ), calling works fine with Skype and exchanging photos is easy with Instagram (for that reason bought by Facebook for no less than 1 billion dollars). And if you share what you find beautiful or interesting, Pinterest and Tumblr are popular. In short: simple apps with not too many different functions that you can quickly switch between.