How have social sciences impacted the concepts of work, economics and business administration?
Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2025 10:51 am
So far, we have discussed the context that gave rise to the social sciences and the “fuels” that drive these theories. Now is the time to analyze how the development of social thinking has affected labor relations and the way in which companies and the market are established.
First, it is necessary to briefly review the redefinition of the human being in society. Scientific evolution has gradually given man a leading role. Religious explanations have left the scene, man has become the center of his own existence, and rationalism has taken the place of mysticism and belief.
As a result, science develops and the process of discoveries, inventions and improvements accelerates. Scientific thinking becomes something that is accepted and encouraged worldwide, to the detriment lebanon whatsapp data of ideological conservatism. With this change in perspective, the world begins a process of transformation, which culminates in economic changes and the strengthening of capitalism as the dominant economic form.
The relentless pursuit of wealth led to wider social differences. Although not new, class differentiation took on new aspects during the 19th century. The working class became a huge portion of the population at the same time that the industrial elite became increasingly powerful.
On one side, there was a bourgeoisie eager for profit, calling the shots on jobs. On the other, there was a huge contingent of people who encouraged the evolution of the world, but in a supporting and often inhumane way.
The sovereignty of those who own the means of production began to be questioned as social tensions worsened. The sole stimulus to economic growth exposed the imbalance of forces and the paradox between production and the concentration of wealth.
Emergence of new social theories
It is in this context that Marxism and Anarchism emerge. The world begins to come into contact with theories in which the worker is seen as the great promoter of wealth, opening its eyes to the importance of the working class and the need for fairer, less exploitative labor legislation that is capable of recognizing the weight of the working class in the new reality of the industrial world.
At the same time, educational processes begin to undergo a new distribution. The demand for qualified labor for factories begins a process of democratization of knowledge.
Children of workers and people included in the most deprived sectors of society begin to have opportunities to study, and, naturally, this process leads to the raising of social awareness and questioning of their role within a group.
When adding the development of social sciences, the discussion on the class struggle and the increase in the intellectual baggage of the proletariat, it becomes clear that companies and industries would not go unscathed by this process.
There is a need to look at factories as complex ecosystems, true microscopic representations of today's society, and this drives the development of business administration as yet another social science.
First, it is necessary to briefly review the redefinition of the human being in society. Scientific evolution has gradually given man a leading role. Religious explanations have left the scene, man has become the center of his own existence, and rationalism has taken the place of mysticism and belief.
As a result, science develops and the process of discoveries, inventions and improvements accelerates. Scientific thinking becomes something that is accepted and encouraged worldwide, to the detriment lebanon whatsapp data of ideological conservatism. With this change in perspective, the world begins a process of transformation, which culminates in economic changes and the strengthening of capitalism as the dominant economic form.
The relentless pursuit of wealth led to wider social differences. Although not new, class differentiation took on new aspects during the 19th century. The working class became a huge portion of the population at the same time that the industrial elite became increasingly powerful.
On one side, there was a bourgeoisie eager for profit, calling the shots on jobs. On the other, there was a huge contingent of people who encouraged the evolution of the world, but in a supporting and often inhumane way.
The sovereignty of those who own the means of production began to be questioned as social tensions worsened. The sole stimulus to economic growth exposed the imbalance of forces and the paradox between production and the concentration of wealth.
Emergence of new social theories
It is in this context that Marxism and Anarchism emerge. The world begins to come into contact with theories in which the worker is seen as the great promoter of wealth, opening its eyes to the importance of the working class and the need for fairer, less exploitative labor legislation that is capable of recognizing the weight of the working class in the new reality of the industrial world.
At the same time, educational processes begin to undergo a new distribution. The demand for qualified labor for factories begins a process of democratization of knowledge.
Children of workers and people included in the most deprived sectors of society begin to have opportunities to study, and, naturally, this process leads to the raising of social awareness and questioning of their role within a group.
When adding the development of social sciences, the discussion on the class struggle and the increase in the intellectual baggage of the proletariat, it becomes clear that companies and industries would not go unscathed by this process.
There is a need to look at factories as complex ecosystems, true microscopic representations of today's society, and this drives the development of business administration as yet another social science.