Social media users are more concerned about
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:06 am
The UK is no longer trying to be “the best in the world”: the challenge is now to create an app with the same functionality as its foreign counterparts.
Given that work will begin later, and other countries are already creating decentralized tracing apps, it is unclear whether the new app will play any role in the UK's fight against coronavirus.
What conclusions can be drawn from this story?
First of all, media reports on the UK’s actions can be bangladesh number data conflicting, and it’s hard to understand what went wrong. Many sources claim that the country will now use an app developed by Google and Apple, combining developer tools with a fully-fledged app. They ignore the fact that the UK already has a decentralized app in development.
the ambiguous role of Dominic Cummings. The prime minister's chief adviser has shown great interest in using data in politics since he successfully used it to plan the Brexit vote.
Numerous viral tweets claim that the British approach was shrouded in data-grabbing tactics, while sources close to the app's developers say the UK was trying to leverage the NHS's excellent expertise to make the app more useful.
Others believe that the reason for the failure lies in the clash between the British government and the tech giants, which the latter won. This happens, but there is no clear evidence for this version. The UK made no effort to legally force Google or Apple to do anything: it asked them to voluntarily weaken privacy protections. But these companies, seeing that many other countries are taking a decentralized approach, decided not to give up. In the end, the UK decided that the fight was not worth the effort.
These problems are specific to the UK, so it is difficult to draw general conclusions from the failures of the NHS. But this example may teach us something.
First, the team focused on the potential benefits of a centralized application and initially ignored all the additional problems associated with this approach. External problems, many of which were publicly discussed, were ignored. The project was managed haphazardly and became the subject of bureaucratic conflicts. This led to unnecessary costs, wasted effort, and wasted time.
The cost of indecision and mistakes is extremely high, especially given that the UK has become one of the countries worst hit by the coronavirus, with more than 40,000 confirmed COVID-19 deaths. Whether or not the UK situation has harmed the future of all tracing apps, it is clear that the lack of clear communication from the authorities has damaged the potential of all the technologies currently in use.
Given that work will begin later, and other countries are already creating decentralized tracing apps, it is unclear whether the new app will play any role in the UK's fight against coronavirus.
What conclusions can be drawn from this story?
First of all, media reports on the UK’s actions can be bangladesh number data conflicting, and it’s hard to understand what went wrong. Many sources claim that the country will now use an app developed by Google and Apple, combining developer tools with a fully-fledged app. They ignore the fact that the UK already has a decentralized app in development.
the ambiguous role of Dominic Cummings. The prime minister's chief adviser has shown great interest in using data in politics since he successfully used it to plan the Brexit vote.
Numerous viral tweets claim that the British approach was shrouded in data-grabbing tactics, while sources close to the app's developers say the UK was trying to leverage the NHS's excellent expertise to make the app more useful.
Others believe that the reason for the failure lies in the clash between the British government and the tech giants, which the latter won. This happens, but there is no clear evidence for this version. The UK made no effort to legally force Google or Apple to do anything: it asked them to voluntarily weaken privacy protections. But these companies, seeing that many other countries are taking a decentralized approach, decided not to give up. In the end, the UK decided that the fight was not worth the effort.
These problems are specific to the UK, so it is difficult to draw general conclusions from the failures of the NHS. But this example may teach us something.
First, the team focused on the potential benefits of a centralized application and initially ignored all the additional problems associated with this approach. External problems, many of which were publicly discussed, were ignored. The project was managed haphazardly and became the subject of bureaucratic conflicts. This led to unnecessary costs, wasted effort, and wasted time.
The cost of indecision and mistakes is extremely high, especially given that the UK has become one of the countries worst hit by the coronavirus, with more than 40,000 confirmed COVID-19 deaths. Whether or not the UK situation has harmed the future of all tracing apps, it is clear that the lack of clear communication from the authorities has damaged the potential of all the technologies currently in use.