Definitions for Performance
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2025 5:12 am
isolation of nuclear structures
As an additional measure, the use of core structures, for example the table that contains a customer's basic data, can also not be directly available to developers, but can only be accessed via a stored procedure. This approach protects these structures from being used in too many complex and mostly unoptimized queries. Furthermore, the risk management system should also contain information about the expected use of indexes and the expected query execution plans. This information can be collected automatically and should ideally be stored in a database system so that later automated test runs can access it. In addition, this data is also of value for operating the application in a productive environment and thus already provides a basis for a baseline for possible monitoring.
In addition, a properly maintained risk management system fulfills another important function. It is a reliable source for improved estimation of the effort required to implement a story, provided that it interacts with the database system. The team is now able to estimate the complexity of development with the database system much better during the sprint planning session. During the sprint retrospective, the risk management system can be expanded to include insights that have led to delays in development or even database performance problems.
Performance is armenia telegram screening an issue at some point in almost every software development process and all too often it is a problem straight away. Be it in the definition of requirements, during the actual development, during subsequent tests or at the latest during acceptance. From this point of view, it does not matter whether it is a classic software development process or an agile approach such as Scrum. The issue often begins with the definition of performance.
For example, in applications with a user interface, performance is often equated with a fluid feeling of work. This is naturally difficult to grasp unless it is specified. Furthermore, the desire for fluid work on the frontend, for example, does not express the conditions under which this should be possible. A presentation of a feature often takes place on an isolated demo system that has no other parallel users. So if performance is to be proven through a direct test using a user interface, then the simulation of hundreds if not hundreds of thousands of users would actually be necessary for realistic experiences.
As an additional measure, the use of core structures, for example the table that contains a customer's basic data, can also not be directly available to developers, but can only be accessed via a stored procedure. This approach protects these structures from being used in too many complex and mostly unoptimized queries. Furthermore, the risk management system should also contain information about the expected use of indexes and the expected query execution plans. This information can be collected automatically and should ideally be stored in a database system so that later automated test runs can access it. In addition, this data is also of value for operating the application in a productive environment and thus already provides a basis for a baseline for possible monitoring.
In addition, a properly maintained risk management system fulfills another important function. It is a reliable source for improved estimation of the effort required to implement a story, provided that it interacts with the database system. The team is now able to estimate the complexity of development with the database system much better during the sprint planning session. During the sprint retrospective, the risk management system can be expanded to include insights that have led to delays in development or even database performance problems.
Performance is armenia telegram screening an issue at some point in almost every software development process and all too often it is a problem straight away. Be it in the definition of requirements, during the actual development, during subsequent tests or at the latest during acceptance. From this point of view, it does not matter whether it is a classic software development process or an agile approach such as Scrum. The issue often begins with the definition of performance.
For example, in applications with a user interface, performance is often equated with a fluid feeling of work. This is naturally difficult to grasp unless it is specified. Furthermore, the desire for fluid work on the frontend, for example, does not express the conditions under which this should be possible. A presentation of a feature often takes place on an isolated demo system that has no other parallel users. So if performance is to be proven through a direct test using a user interface, then the simulation of hundreds if not hundreds of thousands of users would actually be necessary for realistic experiences.