The second part of the question relates to the topic of the sentence
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:16 am
Article 157 and its sole paragraph states:
“A civil liability action… for negligent or intentional acts or acts that violate the law or statutes shall be subject to a three-year statute of limitations.”
The limitation period is therefore three years, counting from when the legislator determined it. However, it was added:
“However, when the act or fact constitutes a crime, the limitation period for the civil action will be the same as that for the criminal action”.
The body of the article therefore targets negligent and intentional acts sms gateway taiwan and those that violate the law and statutes. Until then, they had only been considered from a civil perspective. However, since these acts could constitute a crime, the legislator, in the paragraph, declared that, in this case, the limitation period for civil actions would be the same as for criminal actions. The first part of the question (letter a ) has thus been answered: the legislator provided for two hypotheses. One refers to civil intent (three-year limitation period); the other refers to criminal intent (criminal action limitation period).
10. The second part of the question relates to the topic of the sentence that should be retranscribed:
“For the admissibility of the action, it is not important to inquire into the moral element of the crime, since civil liability is independent of criminal liability”.
“A civil liability action… for negligent or intentional acts or acts that violate the law or statutes shall be subject to a three-year statute of limitations.”
The limitation period is therefore three years, counting from when the legislator determined it. However, it was added:
“However, when the act or fact constitutes a crime, the limitation period for the civil action will be the same as that for the criminal action”.
The body of the article therefore targets negligent and intentional acts sms gateway taiwan and those that violate the law and statutes. Until then, they had only been considered from a civil perspective. However, since these acts could constitute a crime, the legislator, in the paragraph, declared that, in this case, the limitation period for civil actions would be the same as for criminal actions. The first part of the question (letter a ) has thus been answered: the legislator provided for two hypotheses. One refers to civil intent (three-year limitation period); the other refers to criminal intent (criminal action limitation period).
10. The second part of the question relates to the topic of the sentence that should be retranscribed:
“For the admissibility of the action, it is not important to inquire into the moral element of the crime, since civil liability is independent of criminal liability”.