The technical specifications can be adjusted even in the midst of development

[mstakh.i.mo.mi]

Tasks are embodied in code. Testing is in progress. The finished product is put into operation. This approach allows for a return to previous stages if it is obvious that the task is not feasible for technical reasons. However, revision of the technical specifications is an emergency situation – normally the product must meet the initially formulated requirements. If we compare the project management methodologies Waterfall vs Agile, then in the latter the actual needs of the user are more important than the initial settings.

since flexibility implies the absence of a preliminary general plan, and the software gambling data vietnam is written impromptu. It is easier to understand the Agile methodology with an example: a group of developers is creating an audio player. They have already prepared the basis of the program code, which includes the interface and basic functionality. The program successfully plays MP3, WAV and OGG files, but customers want to play CDs and quickly control the device using hot keys.


So the team starts a new iteration and holds a short meeting where tasks and ways to achieve goals are discussed and distributed. And one of the members of the working group suggests including online radio in the system. Next, they move on to development, which can take from several days to weeks. At this stage, they write the program code, integrate it into the product, and test the intermediate result. If the new functions work properly, a new version of the program is compiled, and the file is sent to users.